2020su-apmodr1730f-06

AP/MODR1730 6.0 F: Reasoning About Social Issues

Offered by: MODR


 Session

Summer 2020

 Term

SU

Format

ONLN (Fully Online)

Instructor

Calendar Description / Prerequisite / Co-Requisite

This is a skills-based course focusing on critical thinking, research-based writing, and qualitative and quantitative analysis. The particular focus will be on different positions taken within the social sciences on issues such as abortion, euthanasia, pornography, immigration etc. Typical examples are to be analyzed. Course credit exclusions: AP/MODR 1760 6.00, AP/MODR 1770 6.00.


Course Start Up

Course Websites hosted on York's "eClass" are accessible to students during the first week of the term. It takes two business days from the time of your enrolment to access your course website. Course materials begin to be released on the course website during the first week. To log in to your eClass course visit the York U eClass Portal and login with your Student Passport York Account. If you are creating and participating in Zoom meetings you may also go directly to the York U Zoom Portal.

For further course Start Up details, review the Getting Started webpage.

For IT support, students may contact University Information Technology Client Services via askit@yorku.ca or (416) 736-5800. Please also visit Students Getting Started UIT or the Getting Help - UIT webpages.


    Additional Course Instructor/Contact Details

Course Director:      Jai Chetram

Email:                         jaichetr@yorku.ca and jaichetram@rogers.com

    Expanded Course Description

Please note that this is fully online course. The entire course, including the submission of assignments, participation/discussion and test-taking, will take place on the Moodle website. The format is asynchronous, meaning, you can access the lectures and slides at your own time and pace within the weekly schedules, however,  I will have a few synchronous lectures through Zoom when it comes to tests, and assignment reviews. You will be notified in advance as to the time and dates of live interactive lectures.

    Required Course Text / Readings

Engel, S. Morris.  With Good Reason: An Introduction to Informal Fallacies.  Sixth Edition.  New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s, 2000.

    Weighting of Course

Fallacy test = 25%

Conceptual Analysis Assignment = 25%

Passage Analysis Test = 20%

Article Analysis Assignment = 20%

Homework/Presentation = 10%

 

The two tests will be written Online and Submitted to Turnitin.com.

Unlike Assignments, the test are Time Sensitive. For each test, you will be given 4 hours access on Moodle to complete and submit to Turnitin.com.

Weekly homework will be posted on Moodle. The homework is graded by virtue of completion and not correctness. The correct answers will be posted on Moodle. This is an excellent way to study for the Fallacy Test.

    Organization of the Course

Module 1, Argumentation and Argumentation, Module 2, Conceptual Analysis and Module 3, Passage and Article Analysis.

    Course Learning Objectives
  • Reading Comprehension
  • Active reading; deconstructing others’ ideas; reading between the lines
  • Critical Thinking Skills
  • Critically evaluating what we hear and read; rational decision –making; presenting strong arguments; being aware of cognitive and illegitimate biases (self-bias and others’ bias.)
  • Awareness of Persuasion Techniques
  • Recognizing manipulative persuasion; developing persuasive tactics, ethically.
  • Personal Development discourse
  • hone the disposition of a competent layperson (the ability to engage in civil discourse
  • , even if one isn’t an “expert on the topic; clarity and confidence when presenting views.
  • Writing Skills
  • Improve general writing skills (grammar, writing style, thesis development, etc.); essay organization; writing persuasively; improving self-editing techniques.

(1) How to reason correctly by distinguishing valid and invalid arguments, (Deductive,) to distinguish strong and weak arguments, (Inductive.)

 (2) How to identify fallacies or errors in reasoning committed in everyday discourse.

(3) How to use concepts properly, to distinguish conceptual claims from empirical and normative claims. To separate empirical facts from conceptual meanings and analyzing conceptual questions.

(4) How to apply critical skills to passages and articles that committed errors in reasoning, vague and ambiguous expressions and to diagnose assumptions that underpins concepts and statements. These skills will be applied to passages/articles concerning issues in Social Science,

Humanities, Philosophy, Political Science and Religion.

    Additional Information / Notes

The Senate Grading Scheme and Feedback Policy stipulates that  (a) the grading scheme (i.e. kinds and weights of assignments, essays, exams, etc.) be announced, and be available in writing, within the first two weeks of class, and that, (b) under normal circumstances, graded feedback worth at least 15% of the final grade for Fall, Winter or Summer Term, and 30% for ‘full year’ courses offered in the Fall/Winter Term be received by students in all courses prior to the final withdrawal date from a course without receiving a grade (see the policy for exceptions to this aspect of the policy - http://www.yorku.ca/secretariat/legislation/senate/gradfeed.htm 

 

 “Final course grades may be adjusted to conform to Program or Faculty grades distribution profiles.”

If Term Test will be held outside of regularly scheduled class time, include announcement of day, date and time here (e.g., Saturday, October 28, 2006, 10 am to 11:30, room TBA). 

 

     "20 % Rule"

No examination or test worth more than 20% of the final grade will be given during the last two weeks of classes in a term, with the exception of classes which regularly meet Friday evenings or on the weekend (Saturday and/or Sunday at any time). (Approved by Senate, November 28, 1996)

    Relevant Links / Resources