AP/PHIL3080 3.0 A: Kant
Offered by: PHIL
Session
Fall 2022
Term
F
Format
LECT
Instructor
Calendar Description / Prerequisite / Co-Requisite
For the chief question is always simply this: what and how much can the understanding and reason know apart from all experience? Kant's answer revolutionized philosophy. It is given in the Critique of Pure Reason, which will be studied in detail. Prerequisites: AP/PHIL 2020 3.00 or AP/PHIL 2025 3.00.
Course Start Up
Course Websites hosted on York's "eClass" are accessible to students during the first week of the term. It takes two business days from the time of your enrolment to access your course website. Course materials begin to be released on the course website during the first week. To log in to your eClass course visit the York U eClass Portal and login with your Student Passport York Account. If you are creating and participating in Zoom meetings you may also go directly to the York U Zoom Portal.
For further course Start Up details, review the Getting Started webpage.
For IT support, students may contact University Information Technology Client Services via askit@yorku.ca or (416) 736-5800. Please also visit UIT Student Services or the Getting Help - UIT webpages.
Professor Jim Vernon
jvernon@yorku.ca
Office Location: S427 Ross Building
Phone Number: (416) 736-2100 Ext. 33519
Office Hours: Wednesdays 1:00 – 3:00 (Zoom) by appointment
It is impossible to overestimate the unique importance of Kant's critical philosophy for the history of Western philosophy. His philosophical project was not only one of the paradigms of Enlightenment thought; it synthesized the then-dominant rationalist and empiricist philosophies into a powerful new system that grounded science, morality, and aesthetics on autonomous and human, yet also universal and necessary, reason. It is no exaggeration to refer to all subsequent Continental thought, as well as several important strains of Anglo-American philosophy that emerged after his work, as substantially ‘post-Kantian’.
This course will focus on his masterpiece, the Critique of Pure Reason. Kant's aim in this pivotal work is not just to discover the conditions for the very possibility of empirical experience in general, but, moreover, to determine the specific boundaries of their legitimate employment. The objective of the course is to familiarize students with some of the main concepts of Kant’s theoretical philosophy, and to critically appraise his arguments for them in the light of some historical and contemporary rivals. Topics covered will include: the theory of knowledge and self; the validity of the distinction between how objects appear to us and how they are assumed to exist ‘in themselves’; the role of imagination in the acquisition of empirical knowledge; the conflict between, and shared assumptions of, rationalism and empiricism; causality, duration, simultaneity, and the experience of time; and the ‘necessary illusions’ of metaphysics and how to rationally eliminate them.
Note/Warning: Kant’s magnum opus is not only arguably among the most influential and brilliant (which isn’t to say correct) texts in the history of Western philosophy; it is also an infamously and extremely difficult one. It does not offer a series of theses regarding the topics listed above, but builds them into and defends them through a complex systematic argument, that itself unfolds slowly through the course of dozens of smaller arguments, each as vital as the next. This requires the use of a technical vocabulary often at odds with our usual sense of the words he deploys, as well as a change in understanding our own empirical experience that is – to use Kant’s own analogy – as drastic as the paradigm shift brought about when Copernicus reversed our sense of the relative roles of the Earth and Sun within our solar system. As such, these are readings you will need to do at least twice, and both attendance and active involvement in class are absolutely essential to succeeding in the course. I highly recommend that you and your fellow students form study groups to discuss on their own (philosophy is always better when studied this way), and consult me in office hours and on email whenever you have concerns or questions throughout the course. Finally, a background in rationalism and empiricism (esp. Hume) is very strongly recommended. Sorry for all the italics, etc.; I know it seems excessive, but, seriously, this is a very hard, as well as essential and ultimately (IMHO) philosophically thrilling, book.
Technical requirements for taking the course: The course will run synchronously on Zoom, so you will need a reliable internet connection to participate in the course.
Here are some useful links for student computing information, resources and help:
Zoom@YorkU User Reference Guide
Computing for Students Website
Student Guide to eLearning at York University
To determine Internet connection and speed, there are online tests, such as Speedtest, that can be run.]
Times and locations: [Clearly communicate to students that this is a course that will be remotely delivered, be an online course, etc.. Suggested language is provided in blue font.] Please note that this is a course that depends on remote teaching and learning. There will be no in-person interactions or activities on campus.
Virtual office hours: Wednesdays 1:00 – 3:00 (Zoom) by appointment
Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, trans. P Guyer and A. Wood (Cambridge, 1998)
Please ensure that you use this translation, both so that the whole class is reading a common edition, and so that the vocabulary is common between your text and the lectures/discussions. Kant is hard enough without trying to read across translations that often differ sharply in terms of word choice; it is also rapidly becoming the industry standard, for it is the most accurate reflection of the German original available.
Kant also produced two versions of his work, and although they are largely similar, one whole section was deleted and replaced with a new argument, and many smaller additions or deletions were made throughout. The numbers in the original manuscripts (the so-called A and B editions of the 1st Critique), are listed in the margins of virtually all extant editions, and it has become customary for scholars to refer to these numbers rather than the pages. Because any secondary sources you encounter will assuredly use them, and because there may be e-versions of this text available with different pagination, I have followed this tradition below, and will in the lectures as well.
Mid-Term Exam 25%
Term Paper 35%
Take-Home Final ‘Exam’ 40%
Lecture/Reading Schedule
Tues. Sept. 13th
Intro. to Kant’s Critical Philosophy (Suggested Reading: the Prefaces and Introductions)
Tues. Sept. 20th
Transcendental Aesthetic (A19/B33-A49/B73)
Tues. Sept. 27th
Logic; Intro to the Analytic; Intro to the Deduction (A51/B75-A94/B129)
Tues. Oct. 4th
B Deduction (B130-B169)
Tues. Oct. 11th
No class (Holiday)
Essay Topics Posted on Website!
Tues. Oct. 18th
Analytic of Principles; Schematism (A130/B169-A162/B202); midterm review
Tues. Oct. 25th
Mid-Term Exam
Tues. Nov. 1st
Axioms, Anticipations; 1st Analogy (A162/B202-A189/B232)
Tues. Nov. 8th
2nd and 3rd Analogies (A188/B232-A218/B265)
Tues. Nov. 15th
Postulates; Phenomena and Noumena (A218/B266-A260/B315)
Tues. Nov. 22nd
Transcendental Illusion (A293/B349-A340/B398)
Tues. Nov. 29th
Antinomies (A405/B432-A567/B595)
Essays Due (on turnitin.com)!
Tues. Dec 6th
Antinomies, continued (A405/B432-A567/B595); Concluding discussion
Tues. Dec. 13th
Take Home Due (on turnitin.com)!
The objective of the course is to familiarize students with some of the main concepts of Kant’s Critical philosophy, and to critically appraise them in the light of some historical and contemporary rivals.
Term Paper
Term paper topics will be posted on the webpage on October 11th. All questions will require a critical assessment of one of Kant’s core arguments. Secondary research is not strictly required, but is often helpful in making a paper strong, and thus is recommended. I also highly recommend that every student discuss their paper approach with me in office hours or on email. Students who send me by email, or bring to my office, a 2-page outline of the argument they will present in their paper to discuss, will automatically have 5% added to the final grade of their paper. This can be done twice, and if the second draft is, in my judgment, a substantial improvement on the first, a second 5% will be added. I also strongly recommend that all students consult the departmental guide on writing philosophy essays: http://www.yorku.ca/hjackman/Teaching/handbook.pdf
Take-Home Final ‘Exam’
This will not be a formal exam, but a shorter, less formal term paper that you will have one week to write; questions will be similar to the term paper, but will not require scholarly apparatus, etc. The topic will be announced at the end of the final class, and posted on the webpage.
Information on essays and late penalties
Essays are due on the day of the second last class, November 29th. However, all students can have an automatic extension of up to one week for their term paper. The sole penalty will be that you will receive a grade, but no substantive comments. After that week, papers will be accepted for 7 more days, with a penalty of 5% per day, and again, will receive no comments. Students who receive no comments, but do not agree with their grade can then petition to have their work re-graded by someone else, and I will support the petition. After April 13th, term papers will not be accepted, and the take-home final exam cannot be handed in late. Exceptions will only be made for a) illness (with MD’s note) and b) death in the family. I must be given 24 hours notice on email for these exceptions to be made, and they are at my discretion, not automatic. Do NOT slip essays under my door and do NOT email them to me; I will not accept them. Departmental requirements demand that all essays be uploaded to ‘turnitin.com’. Pursuant to the Guidelines of the Yorku Academic Advisory Group, students have the right to opt out of submitting assignments to Turnitin. However, if you elect not to use Turnitin, in order to ensure academic integrity and fairness, I will conduct my own academic integrity review which will require one or more of the following: the submission of multiple drafts, the submission of a detailed annotated bibliography, or the submission of photocopies of source documents. I may also require you to take an oral examination directed at issues of your assignment’s originality, ask you to respond in writing to questions about your assignment’s originality, or provide a written report concerning the process of completing the work. The easiest option, in short, is submitting to Turnitin. I will not assign a grade to any essay that has not been submitted to Turnitin or that has not met my requirements for an alternative academic integrity review.
Information on registering for and using turnitin.com can be found here: http://www.yorku.ca/computng/students/turnitin.html.
Citations
Either MLA or Chicago Manual styles are fine, but they must be used consistently and clearly. In other words, use only one style, and make it an existent style. If you choose to use secondary sources, they must be properly cited in full, lest you fall prey to the perils of…
Academic Dishonesty
It is YOUR responsibility to know what Academic Dishonesty is, what the penalties for it are, and how to avoid it. Know in advance I will seek, at minimum, a zero on the offending work, and that the penalty can include your being debarred, not only from York, but from all Canadian universities. In short, don’t do it. If you are remotely unsure about what levels of citation, collaboration, etc. constitute infractions, consult the academic integrity website for complete information about academic honesty: http://www.yorku.ca/academicintegrity/students.htm.
Course policies
[Insert your course policies on grading, assignment submission, tests and makeup tests, lateness penalties, etc. For language on these policies, please review the basic course outline provided by the Academic Standards, Curriculum & Pedagogy Committee.
If you will be including audio-visual recordings of your live sessions on Moodle, you may wish to include a course policy on how those recordings should be used by students. Please review the guidelines for the taking and use of photographs, video and audio recordings by York employees. Please note in your policy that 1) the recordings should be used for educational purposes only and as a means for enhancing accessibility; 2) students do not have permission to duplicate, copy and/or distribute the recordings outside of the class (these acts can violate not only copyright laws but also FIPPA); and 3) all recordings will be destroyed after the end of classes.
For some common language about academic integrity, and the online tools used to promote it, please see the text in blue font below. Please note that students should be able to opt out of Turnitin and remote proctoring, if they so choose. For the few students who opt out, they will need to inform you. For these students, please make alternative arrangements for assignment submission and/or assessment. Students who opt out should not be penalized in any way.]
- Academic Honesty
- Student Rights and Responsibilities
- Religious Observance
- Grading Scheme and Feedback
- 20% Rule
No examinations or tests collectively worth more than 20% of the final grade in a course will be given during the final 14 calendar days of classes in a term. The exceptions to the rule are classes which regularly meet Friday evenings or on Saturday and/or Sunday at any time, and courses offered in the compressed summer terms. - Academic Accommodation for Students with Disabilities