2022f-apphil3260a-03

AP/PHIL3260 3.0 A: Philosophy of Psychology

Offered by: PHIL


 Session

Fall 2022

 Term

F

Format

LECT

Instructor

Calendar Description / Prerequisite / Co-Requisite

An examination of whether psychological research can help to answer traditional philosophical questions. Case studies may include: psychiatric and mental disorders, rational thought, animal cognition, the placebo effect, the nature of concepts, attribution theory, moral psychology, or consciousness. Prerequisites: AP/PHIL 2160 3.00 or AP/PHIL 2240 3.00.


Course Start Up

Course Websites hosted on York's "eClass" are accessible to students during the first week of the term. It takes two business days from the time of your enrolment to access your course website. Course materials begin to be released on the course website during the first week. To log in to your eClass course visit the York U eClass Portal and login with your Student Passport York Account. If you are creating and participating in Zoom meetings you may also go directly to the York U Zoom Portal.

For further course Start Up details, review the Getting Started webpage.

For IT support, students may contact University Information Technology Client Services via askit@yorku.ca or (416) 736-5800. Please also visit Students Getting Started UIT or the Getting Help - UIT webpages.


    Additional Course Instructor/Contact Details

Dr. Dylan Ludwig
dylan.m.ludwig@gmail.com
Office Location:  N823 Ross Building
Phone Number:  TBA

Office Hours:  Tuesdays, 12:30-1:30 (or by appointment)

    Expanded Course Description

This course examines some central philosophical issues through the lens of psychological science. Drawing on research by both philosophers and psychologists, we will consider what different experimental and clinical paradigms in the history of psychology can tell us about persisting philosophical problems concerning the nature of the mind and its functions. In particular, this course will focus on a range of hotly debated topics related to perception, conceptual thought, emotion, and bias.

    Required Course Text / Readings

TBA

    Weighting of Course

Attendance and Participation 5%-It is important to show up to each class ready to discuss the assigned reading material.

 

Reading Responses 40%-(Due at noon day of class) You will be asked to submit 4 short reading responses (worth 10% each) that will address topics that arise in the weekly assigned readings. These will be no more than 2 double-spaced pages, submitted to Turnitin BY NOON on the day of class where we will discuss the relevant readings. See Reading Schedule for specific dates.

 

Paper outline 15%-(Due November 1st) You will be asked to submit an outline for your final paper idea, no more than 2 double-spaced pages, that includes an abstract with thesis statement and outline of the main argumentative strategy, and a short literature review.

 

Final Paper 40%-(Due December 13th) Submit a final paper to Turnitin, 10-12 double-spaced pages, normal formatting and citation rules apply.

 

    Organization of the Course

Reading Schedule:

(All readings available online through the York University Library/eClass)

 

Week 1 (September 13th): Introduction-Course mechanics and core issues

 

Week 2 (September 20th): Perception

  • Clarke, Sam (2021). Cognitive penetration and informational encapsulation: Have we been failing the module? Philosophical Studies178 (8):2599-2620.
  • Lupyan, G., Abdel Rahman, R., Boroditsky, L., & Clark, A. (2020). Effects of Language on Visual Perception. Trends in cognitive sciences24(11), 930–944.

 

Week 3 (September 27th): Perception ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Siegel, Susanna & Byrne, Alex (2017). Rich or thin? In Bence Nanay (ed.), Current Controversies in Philosophy of Perception. New York, USA: Routledge. pp. 59-80.
  • Kominsky, J. F., & Scholl, B. J. (2020). Retinotopic adaptation reveals distinct categories of causal perception. Cognition203, 104339.

 

Week 4 (October 4th): Perception

  • Peters, M. A. K., Kentridge, R. W., Phillips, I., & Block, N. (2017). Does unconscious perception really exist? Continuing the ASSC20 debate. Neuroscience of Consciousness. 1–11.
  • Brogaard B. (2011). Are there unconscious perceptual processes?. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(2), 449–463.

 

Week 5 (October 11th): Reading Week-No Class

 

Week 6 (October 18th): Concepts ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Barsalou, L.W. (2016) Situated conceptualization: theory and applications. In Foundations of embodied cognition. Volume 1, perceptual and emotional embodiment (eds Y Coello, MH Fischer), pp. 11 – 37. East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
  • Machery, E. (2016). The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis. Psychonomic bulletin & review23(4), 1090-1095.

 

Week 7 (October 25th): Concepts

  • Connell, Louise & Lynott, Dermot. (2014). Principles of Representation: Why You Can’t Represent the Same Concept Twice. Topics in Cognitive Science, Volume 6, Issue 3, 390-406.
  • Casasanto, D. & Lupyan, G. (2015). All Concepts Are Ad Hoc Concepts. In The Conceptual Mind, eds. Eric Margolis and Stephen Laurence, MIT Press.

 

Week 8 (November 1st): Emotion ****Paper Outline Due****

  • James, W. (1884). What is an Emotion? Mind9(34), 188–205.
  • Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69(5), 379–399.

 

Week 9 (November 8th): Emotion

  • Ekman, P. (1999). Basic emotions. Handbook of cognition and emotion98(45-60), 16.
  • Barrett, L. F. (2006). Valence is a basic building block of emotional life. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 35–55

 

Week 10 (November 15th): Emotion ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Ginot, E. (2015). The Lasting Power of Anxiety: The Developmental Building Blocks of Self-Systems. In The Neuropsychology of the Unconscious—Integrating Brain and Mind in Psychotherapy. Norton, New York.
  • Capitão, L. P., Underdown, S. J., Vile, S., Yang, E., Harmer, C. J., & Murphy, S. E. (2014). Anxiety increases breakthrough of threat stimuli in continuous flash suppression. Emotion14(6), 1027.

 

Week 11 (November 22nd): Bias

  • Gigerenzer, G., & Brighton, H. (2009). Homo heuristicus: why biased minds make better inferences. Topics in cognitive science1(1), 107–143.
  • Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & cognition39(7), 1275–1289.

 

Week 12 (November 29th): Bias ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Rajsic, J., Wilson, D. E., & Pratt, J. (2015). Confirmation bias in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(5), 1353–1364.
  • Mercier, H. (2017). Confirmation Bias—Myside Bias. In R. F. Pohl (Ed.), Cognitive illusions: Intriguing phenomena in thinking, judgment and memory (p. 99–114). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.

 

Week 13 December 6: Bias

  • Farrell, L., Cochrane, A., & McHugh, L. (2015). Exploring attitudes towards gender and science: The advantages of an IRAP approach versus the IAT. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science4(2), 121-128.
  • Lai, C. K., Marini, M., Lehr, S. A., Cerruti, C., Shin, J.-E. L., Joy-Gaba, J. A., Ho, A. K., Teachman, B. A., Wojcik, S. P., Koleva, S. P., Frazier, R. S., Heiphetz, L., Chen, E. E., Turner, R. N., Haidt, J., Kesebir, S., Hawkins, C. B., Schaefer, H. S., Rubichi, S., . . . Nosek, B. A. (2014). Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(4), 1765–1785.

 

Syllabus subject to change given sufficient notice

 

    Course Learning Objectives

TBA

    Relevant Links / Resources