2022f-apphil3635a-03

AP/PHIL3635 3.0 A: Philosophy of Neuroscience

Offered by: PHIL


 Session

Fall 2022

 Term

F

Format

LECT

Instructor

Calendar Description / Prerequisite / Co-Requisite

A critical examination of philosophical problems raised by neuroscientific research, which asks whether such research can help to answer traditional philosophical questions. The course introduces the goals, methods, techniques and theoretical as well as conceptual commitments of neuroscience and examines the field's background assumptions, limitations and pitfalls. Prerequisites: AP/PHIL 2160 3.00 or AP/PHIL 2240 3.00.


Course Start Up

Course Websites hosted on York's "eClass" are accessible to students during the first week of the term. It takes two business days from the time of your enrolment to access your course website. Course materials begin to be released on the course website during the first week. To log in to your eClass course visit the York U eClass Portal and login with your Student Passport York Account. If you are creating and participating in Zoom meetings you may also go directly to the York U Zoom Portal.

For further course Start Up details, review the Getting Started webpage.

For IT support, students may contact University Information Technology Client Services via askit@yorku.ca or (416) 736-5800. Please also visit Students Getting Started UIT or the Getting Help - UIT webpages.


    Additional Course Instructor/Contact Details

Dr. Dylan Ludwig
dylan.m.ludwig@gmail.com
Office Location:  S423 Ross Building
Phone Number:  TBA
Office Hours:  Thursdays, 12:30-1:30 (or by appointment)

    Expanded Course Description

How does philosophical thought contribute to empirical neuroscientific research? How does studying the brain and nervous system help us address significant philosophical problems? This course will explore the mutually informative relationship between philosophy and neuroscience. We will discuss the nature of neuroscientific research, its value and limitations as a philosophical resource, and how it can be brought to bear on a number of specific philosophical issues, including: representation, perception and cognition, emotion, social bias, and consciousness.

    Required Course Text / Readings

TBA

    Weighting of Course

Attendance and Participation 5%-It is important to show up to each class ready to discuss the assigned reading material.

 

Reading Responses 40%-(Due at noon day of class) You will be asked to submit 4 short reading responses (worth 10% each) that will address topics that arise in the weekly assigned readings. These will be no more than 2 double-spaced pages, submitted to Turnitin BY NOON on the day of class where we will discuss the relevant readings. See Reading Schedule for specific dates.

 

Paper outline 15%-(Due October 27th) You will be asked to submit an outline for your final paper idea, no more than 2 double-spaced pages, that includes an abstract with thesis statement and outline of the main argumentative strategy, and a short literature review.

 

Final Paper 40%-(Due December 8th) Submit a final paper to Turnitin, 10-12 double-spaced pages, normal formatting and citation rules apply.

    Organization of the Course

Reading Schedule:

(All readings available online through the York University Library/eClass)

 

Week 1 September 8th  Introduction: Course mechanics and core issues

 

Week 2-September 15th Reductionism and Eliminativism

  • Churchland, P. M. (1985). Reduction, Qualia, and the Direct Introspection of Brain States. The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 8-28.
  • Murphy, D. (2017). Brains and Beliefs: On the Scientific Integration of Folk Psychology. In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, ed. David M. Kaplan. Oxford University Press.

 

Week 3- September 22nd Special Sciences and Multiple Realizability ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Fodor, J. (1974). Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis). Synthese, 28:2, 97-115.
  • Aizawa, K. (2017). Multiple Realization, Autonomy and Integration. In Explanation and Integration in Mind and Brain Science, ed. David M. Kaplan. Oxford University Press.

 

Week 4- September 29th Neuroscientific Methods: Progress and Problems

  • Brett, M., Johnsrude I. S., & Owen, A. M. (2002). The Problem of Functional Localization in the Human Brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 243-249.
  • Poldrack, R. A., & Yarkoni, T. (2016). From brain maps to cognitive ontologies: informatics and the search for mental structure. Annual review of psychology, 67, 587-612.

 

Week 5-October 6th Structure and Function ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Price, C. & Friston, K. (2005). Functional ontologies for cognition: The systematic definition of structure and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology 22(3), 262
  • Anderson, M. L. (2014). Introduction. After phrenology: Neural reuse and the interactive brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

 

Week 6 October 13th - Reading Week: No Classes

 

Week 7-October 20th  Case Study: Representation

  • Poldrack, Russell A. (2020). The physics of representation. Synthese199 (1-2):1307-1325.
  • Bednar, J. A., & Wilson, S. P. (2016). Cortical Maps. The Neuroscientist, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 604-617.

 

Week 8- October 27th Case Study: Perception and Cognition ****Paper Outline Due****

  • Mandelbaum, E. (2017). Seeing and Conceptualizing: Modularity and the Shallow Contents of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 97: 2, 267-283.
  • Wu, W. (2017). Shaking up the Ground Floor: The Cognitive Penetration of Visual Attention. The Journal of Philosophy. Volume CXIV, No. 1, 5-32.

 

Week 9- November 3rd Case Study: Emotion

  • Barrett, L. F. & Wager, T. D. (2006). The structure of emotion: evidence from neuroimaging studies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Volume 15, Number 2, 79-83.
  • Sergerie, K., Chochol, C., & Armony, J. L. (2008). The Role of the Amygdala in Emotional Processing: A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Neuroimaging Studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 32, 811-830.
  • Beyeler, A. Chang, C-J., Silvestre, M. Leveque, C., Namburi, P., Wildes, C. P., & Tye, K. M. (2018). Organization of valence-encoding and projection-defined neurons in the basolateral amygdala. Cell Reports, 22: 905-918.

 

Week 10-November 10th Case Study: Social Bias ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Phelps, E. A., O’Connor, K. J., Cunningham, W. A., & Funayama, E. S. (2000). Performance on indirect measures of race evaluation predicts amygdala activation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 12: 5, 729-738.
  • Amodio, D. (2014). The Neuroscience of Prejudice and Stereotyping. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Volume 15, 670–682.

 

Week 11-November 17th Case Study: Consciousness

  • Berti, A. & Rizzolatti, G. (1992). Visual Processing without Awareness: Evidence from Unilateral Neglect. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(4).
  • Koch, C., Massimini, M., Boly, M., & Tononi, G. (2016). Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, pages 307–321.

 

Week 12 November 24th -Case Study: Consciousness ****Reading Response Due by Noon****

  • Dehaene, S., Changeux, J-P., Naccache, L., Sackur, J., & Sergent, C. (2006). Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 10, No. 5, 204-211.
  • Tononi, G., Boly, M., Massimini, M. & Koch, C. (2016). Integrated information theory: from consciousness to its physical substrate. Nat Rev Neurosci17, 450–461.

 

Week 13 December 1st -Case Study: Consciousness

  • Lamme, V. A. F., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2000). The Distinct Modes of Vision Offered by Feedforward and Recurrent Processing. Trends in Neurosciences, 23, 571-579.
  • Malach, R. (2021). Local neuronal relational structures underlying the contents of human conscious experience. Neuroscience of consciousness, 2021(2), niab028.

 

Syllabus subject to change given sufficient notice

    Course Learning Objectives

TBA

    Relevant Links / Resources