Course Director: Dr. Chandra Kumar

Email: yorkmodr1770s@gmail.com.

Please use the above gmail address for all correspondence re: this course.

Class Times and Location: F: 11:30 – 2:30 pm, VH 3006.

Zoom Office Hours: Tuesday, 11-12 am, beginning Sept. 13. Zoom link will be sent to students’ ‘preferred email’ address (the address listed as ‘preferred email’ with York University).

This course is aimed at developing our capacities for critical reasoning. There are at least two ways of understanding the notion of 'critical reasoning.'

First, 'critical reasoning' refers to the use of logic, evidence, and argument in forming and evaluating arguments and opinions. Critical reasoning, in this sense, can help us to identify arguments (in books, newspapers, films, literature, on television, radio, social media, and so on), to detect fallacies and other weaknesses in those arguments, and to understand how those arguments may be rationally strengthened and improved—if they can be.

Second, 'critical reasoning' refers to the use of our rational capacities to identify and to evaluate various modes of persuasion (not only arguments) that serve to reinforce and rationalize conventional and/or ideological assumptions and views of the world that are often unquestioned or uncritically accepted.

Critical reasoning in this second sense, though it is related to, and draws upon, critical reasoning in the first sense, does something more. In this second sense of 'critical reasoning', the aim is to defend ourselves, not only against bad arguments in general, but against bad political, ideological, and propagandistic forms of persuasion in particular.

In the first sense of 'critical reasoning,' the kind that introductory textbooks usually focus on, we are concerned with arguing well in general. In the second sense, we focus on arguing well on political, social and moral questions in particular—on humanly important matters that are relevant to how we live our lives and to what kind of society we wish to strive for and defend.

This will be a course in critical reasoning in both senses. We want to develop our capacities for rational argument in general, and for rational self-defence against ideological and political propaganda (which often occurs in advertising as well as directly political rhetoric) in particular.

Critical reasoning in the first sense does not require much knowledge of politics, history, and society. Critical reasoning in the second sense is simply impossible without some such knowledge of the 'real world'. Critical reasoning in both senses requires a capacity for reading comprehension, and for clear thinking and writing. The aim of this course is to improve all of these capacities.

Randal Marlin, Propaganda and the Ethics of Persuasion, 2nd ed. (Broadview Press, 2013). Other readings will be sent via email.

NOTE: We will NOT be using E-Class for this course. Additional readings will be emailed to students—using your listed ‘preferred email’ address. Weekly (non-mandatory) ZOOM Office Hours (see above) will be arranged. The Zoom link for this, as all other course-related material, will be sent to your ‘preferred email’. There will be no video or audio lectures. Lecture notes will be sent to your ‘preferred’ email as we proceed.

1. Five short written assignments (dates announced as we go along): 15%.
   2. First exam: 20% - week of Oct. 21.
   3. Second exam: 20% - week of Jan 27.
2. Third exam: 20% - week of Mar. 24.
3. Final take-home essay assignment (4-6 pages typed, double-spaced): 25% - due no later than Apr. 14.

Plan for the Course

Our text deals primarily (but not only) with 'critical reasoning' in the second sense specified above. The book covers many topics, including the history of propaganda, techniques for analyzing propaganda, the relationship between ethics and propaganda, issues of free speech and expression, propaganda in advertising and the public relations industry, and the internet as a vehicle for both democracy and propaganda. You are not expected to read the entire book. I will indicate which parts of the book will be required for exams and assignments.

You are expected to read the items that are required and that will be sent to you via email, unless I indicate that an item is optional. I will base my lecture notes both on the text and on other materials—which will include video clips from the internet, readings, passages, or exercises posted to your ‘preferred’ email address, and (possibly) one or two movies or documentaries (TBA).

The text is not easy, and it is kind of dry in parts, but it is worth struggling through—though, again, we will not cover all of it. I will not make the exams and assignments as difficult as the text. It is a first year course, after all. But the text has a wealth of information and important history relating to propaganda. You’ll learn a lot from it if you make an effort.

With my lectures notes, which will be provided to you as we proceed, I will try to simplify the basic points you are expected to know for exams and assignments, and I will provide guidance for writing exams and short written assignments. So do not be intimidated by the text if you find it hard or overwhelming.

To do well in this course, it is advisable to do the readings, go carefully over the lecture notes that will be provided and to attend classes and discuss the material.

I will provide examples of propaganda and political argument throughout the course. As well, I will post three short writing assignments through email, with due dates and times, which you will submit via email to yorkmodr1770s@gmail.com.

There will be five such assignments. These short assignments will be worth 15 percent of your final grade. For each assignment that you do not submit on time, you will lose 3 percent. If you do not submit any of these, you will lose the full 15%. If you submit an assignment but clearly made no effort to do it properly, or didn’t really address what you were being asked, you will lose part marks.

Apart from the three short assignments, there will be three exams, each worth 20%. There will also be a final take-home essay assignment, worth 25%.