AP/MODR1730 6.0 C: Reasoning About Social Issues
Offered by: MODR
Session
Fall 2024
Term
Y
Format
LECT
Instructor
Calendar Description / Prerequisite / Co-Requisite
This is a skills-based course focusing on critical thinking, research-based writing, and qualitative and quantitative analysis. The particular focus will be on different positions taken within the social sciences on issues such as abortion, euthanasia, pornography, immigration etc. Typical examples are to be analyzed. Course credit exclusions: AP/MODR 1760 6.00, AP/MODR 1770 6.00.
Course Start Up
Course Websites hosted on York's "eClass" are accessible to students during the first week of the term. It takes two business days from the time of your enrolment to access your course website. Course materials begin to be released on the course website during the first week. To log in to your eClass course visit the York U eClass Portal and login with your Student Passport York Account. If you are creating and participating in Zoom meetings you may also go directly to the York U Zoom Portal.
For further course Start Up details, review the Getting Started webpage.
For IT support, students may contact University Information Technology Client Services via askit@yorku.ca or (416) 736-5800. Please also visit UIT Student Services or the Getting Help - UIT webpages.
Course Instructor Contact: znabolsy@yorku.ca,
Office Hours: Tuesday, 2:30 – 5 pm, Ross Building, S418
In this course you will develop the ability to identify and critically assess different argumentative structures. You will learn to distinguish between valid arguments and invalid arguments, as well as between sound arguments and unsound arguments. While the notions of validity and invalidity are undoubtedly important, there are many forms of argument which are widely deployed, but which are nevertheless invalid from a strictly formal point of view. Yet, as we will discover, such argumentative forms are indispensable, so we have to develop our capacity to assess such arguments. To this end we will be discussing how to assess the strengths of abductive and inductive arguments. This course is very much geared towards the practical application of key theoretical notions, and our discussion of these topics will be tethered to a discussion of some key social issues such as: whether we should raise or decrease the minimum wage, whether war is ever just, whether something like human nature exists, and if so, is it good or bad (or is that just a bad question to ask in the first place!), the evidence for anthropogenic climate change, and the nature of identity politics (who does it harm? who does it benefit?).
Sharon Bailin and Mark Battersby. Reason in the Balance (Second Edition). Indianapolis: Hackett, 2016.
Taiwo, Olufemi. Elite Capture: How the Powerful Took Over Identity Politics (And Everything Else). Chicago: Haymarket Books, 2022.
- Fall mid-term I (15%).
- Fall mid-term II (15%).
- Fall writing assignment (20 %).
- Winter mid-term I (15%).
- Winter mid-term II (15%).
- Winter final project (20%).
Class Organization: Class time will be divided between lectures and in-class individual and group exercises. Depending on the nature of the material covered in any given week, more time maybe devoted to lecturing or to in-class exercises and discussion. It is vital for students to attend class in person (unless there is an emergency).
Times and locations: This course will meet for three hours in person on Tuesday at 11: 30 am.
- Learn how to discern the argumentative structure of different texts.
- Learn how to assess the adequacy or inadequacy of different forms of argument.
- Understand what counts as a good deductive argument.
- Understand what counts as a good inductive argument.
- Understand what counts as a good abductive argument.
- Identify some common fallacies.
- Write clearly and effectively with the aim of rationally persuading your reader.
- Develop a critical independent perspective on social issues.
Assignment Submission, Late Penalties, and Other Policies:
Assignments will be due at 11:59 pm on the day that they are due. I am happy to grant you extensions as long as you ask at least three days in advance. Unless you have an emergency, I am not going to grant you an extension if you ask me for an extension the day that the assignment is due. If you do not have an extension, then late assignments will be penalized at half a letter grade per day. So, for example, if you get an A+ on an assignment that is two days late, you will receive a grade of B+, and so on.
Students who miss the tests with a valid excuse (e.g., through illness) will be provided with the opportunity to make up for the missed test with no penalty.
All work submitted must be your own work. Plagiarism is a very serious academic transgression and it will not be tolerated. Please see the definition provided by York University. The use of A.I. such as ChatGPT is strictly prohibited.
I strive to create an inclusive classroom environment where everyone is welcome. If you need any accommodations please let me know as soon as possible, and we will develop a plan in collaboration with Student Accessibility Services.
Some of the topics that we will be discussing will undoubtedly lead to the raising of controversial opinions, and I encourage civil critical debate. However, any discriminatory or hateful remarks are not welcome in class.
- Academic Honesty
- Student Rights and Responsibilities
- Religious Observance
- Grading Scheme and Feedback
- 20% Rule
No examinations or tests collectively worth more than 20% of the final grade in a course will be given during the final 14 calendar days of classes in a term. The exceptions to the rule are classes which regularly meet Friday evenings or on Saturday and/or Sunday at any time, and courses offered in the compressed summer terms. - Academic Accommodation for Students with Disabilities